March 31, 2008 1:59 PM
Obama doesn't want his daughters "punished with a baby"
Words matter - don't you think so?
What to make of Obama's statement:
"When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include -- which should include abstinence education and teaching the children -- teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include -- it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I've got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby. I don't want them punished with an STD at the age of 16. You know, so it doesn't make sense to not give them information." [my emphasis]
David Brody reports, discusses, and asks for input: Obama Says He Doesn't Want His Daughters Punished with a Baby
I have to say that regardless of all the spin that will be used to lay this one to rest, it is usually in the off-the-cuff remarks that we hear the true hearts of the candidates. We already knew that Obama is the most pro-abortion candidate running. I guess it's easy to justify that even if you claim to be a follower of Christ if you view children - of any kind or degree of "wantability" - as punishments rather than blessings.
Posted in Campaign 2008 | Permalink
Comments
I agree - the casual remark is much more telling that the carefully planned speech at showing a candidates true beliefs. "Punished with a baby" is truly a sad thing to think. What about the poor baby "punished" with a teenaged parent? Clearly personal responsibility is not terribly important to him and that will influence every decision he makes - I just pray he isn't making decisions as our President.
Posted by: Shannon Miller | March 31, 2008 2:41 PM
So, according to Obama, I am a mistake, and my mother was punished with me when she was a teen. I should have been punished instead - maybe by being dismembered alive. That's the Obama choice.
Posted by: Carol | March 31, 2008 2:49 PM
Obamarama makes me sick! He supports the murder of the most innocent among us and wants to disarm our military. Sickening and frightening!
Posted by: Libby | March 31, 2008 3:05 PM
Oh that makes me sick!
We have the most beautiful mom and baby in our Bible study group. Yes, he was a "mistake": his mom was 22 and unmarried when she gave birth. But what miracles God sends us! He has changed her life, brought her so much closer to Christ, grown her up spiritually, emotionally - it is a joy to see her continue to grow, and to see this gorgeous baby boy so happy and healthy. Far from being punished, they both have been blessed beyond imagination.
How Obama can say such a thing when there are such miracles in the world, I have no idea!
Posted by: Tari | March 31, 2008 6:55 PM
To take another tack on this--why shouldn't they be "punished" with babies? What Obama is really saying is that I don't want my daughters to have to face the natural, logical, easily-foreseeable consequences of their actions.
That's what many Democrat politicians believe. If you make a mistake, the government should be there to bail you out, because we wouldn't want to make moral judgments. But why should we bail others out? The best way to learn is to make a mistake and then to have to deal with it. If we as a society did that more often, there would be far fewer abortions, pregnancies, welfare cases, cheating spouses, abusing spouses, etc. etc.
Posted by: Sheila | March 31, 2008 7:19 PM
When I was 20, unmarried, and living with my boyfriend, I was BLESSED with a baby who changed my viewpoint and showed me the error of my ways. Yes, I made a mistake, and God in His graciousness gave me an opportunity for growth and joy instead of punishment.
Posted by: Michelle Potter | March 31, 2008 8:32 PM
Another reason for liberals to love him, though.
So, so sad. :(
So sad for girls to be told that a surgical violation of their body and the murder of their baby is a better solution.
Posted by: Margaret | March 31, 2008 9:53 PM
That "hope" Obama speaks of is very case specific apparently.
Isn't abortion society's manifestation of hopelessness?
Posted by: Kelly | April 1, 2008 11:12 AM
Is it too much to ask for sex ed and anti-abortion laws? why one or the other?
Posted by: Andrea | September 2, 2008 5:39 PM
